![full tilt poker ponzi full tilt poker ponzi](https://www.top10pokersites.net/news/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/full-tilt-poker.jpg)
Full tilt poker ponzi full#
The more troubling part, if you ask me, is how the aforementioned $330 million gap is going to be accounted for. By the end of 2005, Full Tilt Poker had taken over the online poker scene, leaving Party Poker and PokerStars, their two biggest competitors at the time, far behind. Calling them Ponzi schemes is merely adding fuel to the fire. These sites broke all sorts of laws, and they did so willingly. Yet Bitar managed to escape serious punishment. He was indicted in 2011 on numerous charges in connection with a nearly 400 million Ponzi scheme the site was accused of running. In fact, when you put the big picture in perspective, whether or not Full Tilt Poker and other online poker sites were guilty of running Ponzi schemes almost seems like a petty complaint. Ray Bitar was one of the founders and the chief executive officer (CEO) of Full Tilt Poker. That's what led to their rise to power and ultimately their shutdown. If you're at all curious as to how Full Tilt Poker is (or was) any different from your garden-variety casino, it's a simple matter of government regulations.Ĭasinos are heavily regulated, and online poker sites like Full Tilt never were. Full Tilt Poker Ponzi - Play and win with over fifty slot games including many big global favorites All the top rated slots. It seems that Full Tilt Poker was certainly guilty of running a Ponzi scheme, which, if you don't mind the Wikipedia definition, is an "operation that pays returns to its investors from their own money or the money paid by subsequent investors, rather than from any actual profit earned by the individual or organization running the operation." Seeing as how there was a $330 million gap between what the site owed and what the site actually had, they're clearly not the only ones who did.
![full tilt poker ponzi full tilt poker ponzi](http://www.pokerakademia.com/uploads/howard-lederer-919.jpg)
Justice Department in September 2011 alleging Full Tilt Poker was a Ponzi scheme. The complaint goes on to accuse Howard Lederer and Chris Ferguson, widely-known poker players and defendants in the case, of pocketing millions of dollars from the scheme. Lederer and Ferguson were part of a civil lawsuit filed by the U.S. Rather than protect player funds as promised, Full Tilt Poker distributed hundreds of millions of dollars to its owners. Full Tilt Poker relied on new deposits from players to ensure its ability to fund withdrawals to players’ accounts. Attorney's complaint explains things:Īccording to a balance sheet prepared by Full Tilt Poker, as of March 31, 2011, Full Tilt Poker owed players from around the world over approximately $390,695,788, but had only approximately $59,579,413 in its bank accounts.